Monday, November 23, 2015

Keeping my end of the put-selling deal

This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/11/29/keeping-my-end-of-the-put-selling-deal/

Let's follow up on a strategy started on August 25th, which is a day that can be labeled by any one of a number of epithets, as it was the day Mr. Market fell off his barstool.  Actually, August 24th was the day he clawed and struggled all the way down, and the 25th was the day he really went "thud" on the floor.

In this linked post from early October, I detailed some sold puts that got assigned to me; soon after, I disposed of 100 of the 300 resulting shares and kept 200.  The cost basis after accounting for the premium received was $53.61 per share on SVXY purchased at the contracted-for price of $57.50 on the expiration date of August 28th.  The premium I received, as you can deduce from observing the discrepancy between contracted strike and cost basis, served as a down payment on shares, and since SVXY closed that day (the contract expiration date of August 28th) at $52.12 (and traded as high as $53.78 during the day), purchasing SVXY at a cost of $53.61 didn't seem like too bad of an outcome at the time.  In fact, as I boasted within the above-linked post, SVXY was $60.85 at the time the post was written (approximately one month after assignment), which gave me a nice unbooked gain on those shares.  It's written in the post, but you can do the math in your head right now:  $7+ per share gain times 200 shares equals more than $1,400 in profit just sitting there ripe for the picking.  In fact, SVXY tried to touch $65 in October.  Did I take the whopping profit?  At any point when SVXY was in the sixties?

You know I'd be posting some tables and charts here, if I did, but I didn't.  Here's what I did next:  As shown in the next post from mid-October, I continued the same strategy of selling naked puts (actually it was singular - just one put) on SVXY, risking that I'd have additional shares put to me (unless I would trade out of the contract first, and it turns out that I did not trade out of the contract first.)  To be more detailed, though, as described in the post, I liked thinking of it as a short strangle, but really it was a covered call and a naked put.  To be precise, I already had more than enough shares to secure the call, and that changes the character of the call.  The put is then out on its own, not part of a set anymore, but something of a spare part; possibly a little unglamorous and undignified as the descriptor "naked" connotes.  At the end of the post, I noted that I didn't plan to buy back the contracts, and I described briefly the three possible outcomes for that "short strangle sandwich" as I like to think of it.  The strategy I had in mind based on the three possible outcomes is as such:

1. Of course I could have just collected the premium for both the call and the put as an uncomplicated end to the whole story, had SVXY stayed between the two strikes of 60 and 66 through November 20th.  (This did not happen.)

2. I could have just had 100 shares of SVXY put to me (which is what actually happened) along with keeping the premium received from the put, and kept all of the premium from the call with no further obligation on that side (I kept only a very small portion of the premium from the call because I bought it back, when in retrospect, I wish I hadn't.)

 

3. I could have had 100 of my 1,000 (at the time) shares of SVXY called away from me along with keeping the premium from the call, and kept all of the premium from the put with no further obligation on that side (which is not what happened, since SVXY ended lower than the $60 put strike on expiration day.)

One thing I did not want was to have any of my shares called away from me, although of course that is a valid strategy and a possible outcome when selling what really amounted to covered calls.  I wasn't swayed by the idea that I could book a gain (by selecting a parcel of shares that I had bought at a lower price than the call strike and recording that as the one I handed over to the call buyer); I simply wanted to keep my shares.  So on October 23rd, when SVXY topped $64 and VIX wore 13.24 and looked like it might try on 12.00 for size, I got nervous and bought the call back in order to protect what I saw as a precious collection of short-volatility cash-producers.  I wasn't really thinking about how low the VIX was or how fast SVXY climbed compared to recent history and expected trajectory (I noticed it -I'm not unobservant); I wasn't thinking about anything but the way SVXY can march straight up and leave you, crying, behind, and I didn't want to subject myself to that vicious treatment for a lousy couple of hundred dollars as consolation prize.  Then I sat tight even when volatility took a hike back up the mountain and SVXY went on an extended lunch break; I accumulated more shares on November 20th for a total of 1,100 shares of SVXY back from lunch and "at work" (hopefully) now.

As of sometime this afternoon (November 23rd)

So, to compare the scenario from my post of early October with the scenario now, and to mention what happened in between, a summary could be made as follows:  In late August I added to an existing collection of SVXY at a cost basis of $53.61 per share.  I did not liquidate any SVXY shares when prices as high as $64+ were reached 1.5 months later, but I did sell more puts (and an ineffectively traded short call) at that time, and ended up taking assignment of more SVXY at a cost basis of $56.49.  Since the great majority, but not all, of the SVXY shares I hold were bought at prices higher than either of those, I reduced my overall cost basis slightly with the first assignment and then again with the second assignment.  I also have a greater number of shares now, so that any rise in SVXY will power a greater overall profit potential for my account.  Whenever desired, I can to write any number (up to eleven) of calls against my shares without taking on the liability of naked calls.  I may have missed the boat by not cashing in any SVXY shares when $65 was visible on the shoreline, but if I see it again, I'll have a bigger boat this time.



Monday, November 2, 2015

How Cheese is Made (Alternate Title: Put the Short Premium in the Bag)

This post may also be read at http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/11/02/put-the-short-premium-in-the-bag/

The tale of October happens to be the tale of my friend, "Mr. G," and what he did to turn $39,727.47 on September 30th into $56,239.25 on October 31st.  How's that for some trick-or-treat plunder?

Here is the breakdown, separated by types of trades, of which there were only a few.  I'll number the types and show the dates and entry and exit points.

1. The greatest number of trades were made by selling short shares of TVIX on different dates between September 22nd and October 23rd, and buying them back on different dates between October 5th and October 28th. 


Between September 22nd and October 28th, TVIX declined by 47%, from $11.11 to $5.92.  Had Mr. G simply sold short approximately 419 shares, which would be about -$4,653 worth of TVIX on September 22nd and bought those back on October 28th for $2,480, he would have been able to realize the same gain:  $2,173.  Most likely the brokerage is happy with his trading habits.  Instead of making those two transactions, he traded with a frequency comfortable to him,  based on risks he decided to take at the time and with larger and smaller amounts from day to day.  Also, he put more or less into this mostly-ongoing short TVIX position based on availability of funds in his account surrounding other trades which he considered more important at most times.

2. A trade parallel to this one was some UVXY shares sold short and then bought back to close, which was soon replaced by another lucrative trade.


As you can see, on October 5th Mr. G sold 200 shares of UVXY short at around $46.28.  The very next day, he bought those shares back for $42.73 and made a profit of $699.35.  Here's what's interesting:  He closed the short at 10:06AM on October 6th.  Now, according to Mr. G, he must have had four cups of coffee that morning, because during, between, and while taking care of that trade, he went and did the following:


At 9:47 AM, before closing the short shares, he believed that the sharp overnight drop in UVXY would be followed by a bounce (as pictured in the chart, he turned out to be right) so he sold two puts that were deep in the money.  Less than one hour later, when those puts were less deep in the money, he bought them back for a tidy gain of $167.  (See below for details.) In the interim, of course, while watching his under-one-hour-dry-cleaning maneuver otherwise known as taking put buyers to the cleaners, he closed the short shares from the day before and moved on to his next method of turning volality into dollah-tility.

3. (category three of Mr. G's trades which is the above-mentioned limited foray into the short-selling of UVXY puts.  Think about the layers of inversity there for a moment.  Selling puts on a leveraged ETF that purchases futures contracts on the VIX, which... Never mind, shaking head and moving on now.)


4. The largest amount of profit in Mr. G's account during October was made by selling shares of SVXY he bought at various points during September and October.
 

He ran 887 shares of SVXY through the washing machine and found $10,049 in the dryer which represents a gain of 23% (he bought $44,364.30 worth of stock, sold the same stock for $54,413.43.)  That's a lot of extra socks in the dryer that came from who-knows-where.  Actually, it's known where they came from:  The S&P went up by 6% between September 10th and October 23rd, and the VIX decreased by 45% during that same time period, and Mr. G sought to participate in the stability-building in the market by buying SVXY low and selling it high.  In addition to shares, he also dealt in calls as such:

5. Bought the December 45 and 50 strike calls for something in the neighborhood of $8.50 and sold them later for something in the zip code of $11; he had ten honking contracts so this was something under $2,500 in extra wallet-stuffings by the time all was said and done.



6. Sold some calls on SVXY and bought them back for a punishing price soon after, which was the only significant money-loser Mr. G experienced this month.  That's another story for another day which will never come, because the story cannot be told (in this venue.)  Sold some puts on SVXY and bought them back for nearly flat; sold some others and let them expire worthless so that a tidy profit was realized on a two-day trade.


The month ended with only the expiring options to be settled (for full profit to Mr. G and a total loss to the put holder) over the weekend, and a fresh, clean slate of working capital with which to generate more returns in November.  Thanks for following along with "guest blogger by proxy," Mr. G, who gave permission for his adventures and misadventures to be documented for entertainment and maybe even 15 minutes of fame.



Monday, October 19, 2015

Closing a volatility short and writing an inverse volatility strangle instead

This post may also be read at www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/10/19/closing-a-volatility-short-selling-an-inverse-volatility-strangle

Let's check back on the progress of a trade last mentioned two posts ago.  This could be described as one of my favorite games ever, formally called "shorting the ultra-long volatility."  I've dabbled in both TVIX and UVXY recently, and the October 6th post illustrated some meat carved off the bone from the eleven-ish level on TVIX down to $9.48, when I just could not resist taking a bite.  To the tune of $651.

Never one to be happy with a clean plate, I loaded the plate again, as alluded to in that post as such: "jumped back in less than one hour later" ... "and sold some UVXY short at $43.79."  I also mentioned that I might have to sit through some adversity with the position, but I didn't really believe it was likely; I was trying to minimize cockiness and also preemptively save face, in the event I might be wrong.  Six trading days later, I bought the short shares back for $38.59, and it was not necessarily to "call bottom" on a move, but rather, to take a short breather and convert the chips back to TVIX.  Why would I do this?


Well, originally, I got the clean hundred of UVXY short shares with the intent of selling one put against it.  But, due to pathological cheapness, I could not bring myself to do it.  Said another way, I didn't think the premium I'd be able to collect at the time would be worth offsetting the potential gains I'd make with UVXY short shares.  Take a look at the activity during the days I held this to see how difficult it was to pick a plausible UVXY bottom:
 


As you can see, I tried all day on Thursday the 8th, but basically sat back in awe of the ever-dropping share price, each minute happier than the minute before that I had not tried to be a wise guy and set a floor on this rolling boulder.  On the 14th, realizing that if I had not sold a put yet, I would probably never do it, I bought the UVXY shares back and then used most of the proceeds to add to an existing TVIX short position I had started to build up on October 7th, 8th, and 12th right after writing my "Book It While It's Hot" blog entry (because apparently I like cooking more than I like booking, so I secretly started a pot boiling as soon as all of you had left the room.)

This brings us all the way to today, where I closed out the varied and sundry lots of TVIX accumulated recently and took a nice profit, but felt immediately afterward like a person who just ate the last piece of cake.  How does such a person feel?  Wondering where their next piece of cake is going to come from - that's how!  Here's the cake, sliced up:


Now I'm in need of something to do if I'm going to stay out of trouble.  I looked over the SVXY options chains this morning when SVXY was trading at around $63.00.  They looked like this:


Here's what I did:  I sold just one call for SVXY expiring on November 20th, 2015 at the 66 strike for $3.17, and I sold one SVXY put for the same expiration at the 60 strike for $3.60.  I have more than 100 shares of SVXY, which makes this what I call a "strangle sandwich" (a short strangle with shares in the middle) but what the brokerage labels a covered call and a naked put.  Here is what a section of my portfolio looked like soon after initiating these positions:



This post is already long, so I'll save the exact profit/loss calculations for the various outcomes and go into them next time.  But the outcomes will run something like this, assuming that I won't buy back the contracts (and I don't plan to):

Keeping the premium received from both legs or
Having 100 shares of SVXY put to me and keeping the premium from both legs or
Having 100 shares of SVXY called away from me and keeping the premium from both legs.  We will see next time which, if any of these outcomes, is looking particularly likely over the other ones, and calculate what might happen regarding additional share purchases or sales connected to these contracts.  I will also go into my motivation for assembling this simple structure of bookend-like contracts.

Monday, October 12, 2015

Option assignment is not always bad

This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/10/13/option-assignment-is-not-always-bad/

If anyone remembers (and even if you don't), back in early September I griped a little about my booked gains/losses for the month of August not showing the premium I received for puts I wrote which were then assigned.  The brokerage incorporates the premium received into the cost basis for the shares upon assignment.  I may not have liked that then, but I sure do like it now.  See illustration below on the transactions and the outcome in my account as of today:


That's the transaction detail showing the $1,165.95 I received for the puts; my gain/loss sheet for the month showed only the notation "OA" (for option assignment) and no dollar amount credited.  Instead, my current holdings show the cost basis being lower than $57.50, as such:


First of all, let's address the missing shares. You can see that I wrote three puts, but there are only 200 shares shown in my portfolio.  I sold 100 shares of SVXY at some point in the interim.  If you want to be detailed about it, well - I sold more than 100 shares from several different basis prices, but let's zoom in on the way the brokerage recorded it (and I was the one who set the LIFO or FIFO, so who really cares, right?) but I did, in fact, sell 100 shares on September 4th for some noble purpose that may not have panned out as profitable, but here is the ugliness, anyway:


So, to recap and refine this story in text format, with the above graphics as visual aids, on August 28th I fell victim to my own put-writing by being assigned 300 shares of SVXY at the contracted price of $57.50.  The brokerage left my gain/loss detail for the month looking unimpressive (even more unimpressive than it already was) by recording the gain/loss as a zero for that transaction and instead logging a nicer price for the shares I was forced to buy.  Instead of $57.50, they were recorded as $53.61 per share to purchase.

Then on September 4th I got the wild idea to take a loss on 100 of those shares to enable some cockamamie scheme (actually it was for the purchase of in-the-money calls - see my blog entries from September 16th and October 3rd - and those calls did end up being sold for a profit.  It looks I got my loss back and tacked $300 on with that venture.)

As of today, the remaining 200 shares of SVXY sit in my account with the price paid noted as 53.61 and the price as of this writing being 60.85 for an unbooked gain of $1,434.61.

The gain I initially realized from the put writing went straight into buying the shares, but an attractive-looking purchase price was recorded.  I lost $743 when selling 100 of those assigned shares, but did make a comparable (plus bonus) profit on a side swindle with the liquidated cash.  And my 200 remaining shares could be sold right now for a $1,434.61 profit.  So being assigned is not always the disaster it is sometimes thought to be.  I used the words "down in the dumps" in September when describing my share holdings, but now I have no complaints.

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Book it while it's hot

This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/10/06/book-it-while-its-hot/

When we last left off, I wrote in detail about the long calls I bought for SVXY.  I still have those, and the update is that while they traded for only $4.64 each at the time last mentioned (versus my $8.50 buying price), the bid/ask on those has risen to $7.00/$8.30 as of this writing, with the last trade recorded at $7.49.  I keep under consideration the idea (translated: I can't wait) of getting out of these calls as soon as I can do so for even money.  All right; it's not really true that I'm chomping to get out of them. I would have to assess conditions at the time.  My intention is to amplify returns that I would expect to make on a particular number of SVXY shares.  I might make money on neither, though, with the shares simply turning into slimmer versions of their former selves (which allows me to retain some value and some hope for future gain - slim livestock can always fatten up) and the calls turning into dust.  That is the risk I took by buying calls.  I will evaluate the risk every day until I get rid of the menacing things.  I have until January, but dollars and time do not always equate in the way we would like, and I'm not crazy about holding a potentially depreciating asset.  This is the extended-mix way to say I am nervous owning long calls.

I will now revisit a topic too tangential to get into in the last post.  I said, "I did something else with the rest of the proceeds" of some liquidated SVXY shares.  Hmm... I could compare the loss I took on those liquidated shares and see how it lines up with the gain I booked on the following.  But I'm not going to do it, mostly because I bought and sold so many small lots of SVXY during the last several months that it would be meaningless to single out one lot and differentiate it from another.  After all, it is up to me to set "FIFO" (first in, first out) or "LIFO" (last in, first out) when I liquidate shares, and I was not even paying attention to that.  I don't really care whether my booked gains and losses look pretty; I expect them to even out in the end with real dollars and not just beautiful ledger entries.

So anyway, on September 18th and 28th I sold some shares of TVIX short.  See detail.  It was 360 shares altogether for an average entry of about $11.31.  Today I bought all of those back to close the trade at $9.48 for a profit of $651.


A visual representation, showing the start of TVIX down the side of the mountain, is below:


Then, never content to consider a trade done and over with, I jumped back in less than one hour later (grabbing a little bit of benefit from momentary float upward in TVIX/UVXY) and sold some UVXY short at $43.79.  (By "momentary float upward" I mean that I sold UVXY short at a higher comparative-to-TVIX price than the point at which I had exited the TVIX short.) I may have to sit through some adversity on this, as I did with the TVIX trade.   My purpose in this was chiefly to convert my TVIX short to a UVXY short, with the possibility open that I can sell covered puts against this position if an attractive opportunity presents itself.


Tuesday, September 29, 2015

I'm way out on the ice


This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/10/02/im-way-out-on-the-ice/

Let me get right down to numbers, since there will be a lot of numbers amongst the words.

In the last post I detailed a bunch of long calls, and an update on those is overdue.  In review:  I had allocated a large (to me) (when it is a risky proposition) amount of money toward seven of the December SVXY calls at the 40 strike, paying about $12.30 each for them (translated to real cost:  $1,230.00 each or $8,610 in total - I'm rounding and ignoring commissions here) when SVXY was about 47.

Just about a week later, I sold them for a modest (but not nearly what I had set out to make) profit and later replaced them with different calls.  Here depicts the disposition of the original calls:

 
SVXY was in the 50+ range on September 15th, and I got scared out and sold the contracts. This was one of my more painful misses.  Later that day and over the next few days, SVXY ripped up to 62.  I recall being in a very bad mood over these particular days.  At least I got a small profit, but I didn't open the trade to make just a small profit.  I had loftier goals in mind.  I shouldn't have done this, but I computed what I would have made (a mentally ill trading behavior) had I held for a few more days, and I don't want to talk about it.  I'm trying to block it out of my mind.



I will not type here how much I might have made. Believe me, I calculated it and made myself sick.  On the other hand, had I been the one to dump these options this afternoon at $9.90, I would have lost $2.40 per contract, or $1,680, so I'll be glad for the similar profit I booked instead.  Moving out of the world of "what could have happened" and back into "what actually did happen," let's continue.

On the 16th, in the throes of the above-mentioned bad mood, I took the proceeds gleaned from the long option closing and bought 240 shares of SVXY at the price of $56.44 per share.  This looked like an ace move for about one day while SVXY shot up to nearly 63.  After it didn't look so ace anymore, on the 18th and 21st, I sold 140 of those shares for the average price of 52.77, booking red ink in the amount of $535  (thus the reference to persistent bad moods.)  I didn't do it because I thought the purchase had been a mistake - in fact, I'm loathe to book any loss and it was like pulling out splinters to do it, but I did it to raise cash for the below:

With $535 loss in hand, I set out to do "long calls, part II."  On September 21st, with SVXY trading for $53-ish still, I decided to change my risky bet... ahem, I mean, long call strategy just a little this time around. In the previous incarnation, I had kept 800 shares of SVXY and added seven long calls on as a sidecar.  This time I kept 900 shares (remember how I bought 240 shares, bringing my total up to 1,040, and then liquidated 140?  So I had 100 more remaining in the account this time.)  The other changes were:  Fewer calls, a higher strike, a farther-out expiration, and less premium paid (because of the strike being higher and the expiration farther into the future.)

On September 21st I bought six of the SVXY $55 calls (this time a few dollars out-of-the-money instead of in-the-money as previously done) for $8.50 each, expiring January 15th.  The total cost was about $5,100.  At expiration, SVXY will have to rise to at least $63.50 just to get my money back out of these.  By contrast, had I simply held the stock (which I sold for $52.77, so let's use that as a comparison point)  I could have 96 shares of SVXY instead of the expensive out-of-the-money calls I bought.   I'm comparing 96 shares, not 140, to the long calls, because I did something else (another story for another day) with the rest of the proceeds of the 140 shares, and 96 shares at 52.77 equals $5,066, which is essentially the same total as the purchase price of the abovementioned options.  96 shares would appreciate by $1,030 on the climb from $52.77 to the hoped-for $63.50, and by comparison, SVXY at 63.50 would bring me merely to flat with the calls I saddled myself with now.

Above the expiration day price of about $65.50, I'd start to make more profit by holding the calls vs. the alternate reality world where I might have opted not to do this maneuver and just kept shares instead.  Let's dream big for a minute and fantasize about SVXY being $80 on January 15th.  (I lie awake at night thinking about these things.)  I would stand to make $2,614 on the 96 shares (which I don't have anymore) but I could sell the calls on expiration day for about $25 each, which is a total sale price of $15,000, with my cost being $5,100 (remember, I paid $8.50 each), for a profit of $9,900.  This is why I bought calls:  To try to bring in more profit from the sale of the calls than I would on simply holding appreciating shares.

As of this writing (September 29th), those calls have most recently traded for $4.64, which is 45% lower than my purchase price, and the shares most recently traded for 45.68 (after hours), which is 13% lower than the comparison price of $52.77.  Good thing I'm not booking anything today, but the shares never expire, and the options expire in January, so I'm on thin ice. We'll see if the ice thickens up by mid-winter.

Friday, September 11, 2015

I don't usually trade long options, but when I do...

This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/09/16/i-dont-usually-trade-long-options-but-when-i-do/

Who buys calls?  Who buys puts?  I often wonder this, as I am usually the one selling them to others.  Do buyers really think they're going to profit from them?  Is a real person buying them?  Is it a bank, or a "market maker" (they are people, right?  I admit I'm confused about those mythical creatures.)

Anyway, it's a rare happenstance that I think a call or put is worth buying.  One thing that makes an option attractive to me is its structure of being deep in the money.  That way, unless the stock moves opposite the direction I'm thinking it will, I'm mostly just paying for what has already happened.  It's a little like buying stock.  I'm paying for the intrinsic value, and what could be more fair than that? (Beyond just buying stock, of course.)  Anything above the intrinsic is a risk I'm taking (actually, the intrinsic is a risk, too, and it's more of a risk than simply buying stock, which is also a risk, but we're talking about gradations of risk, here.)  So, here is what I did and why I did it:

I had 200 shares of SVXY.  Actually I had many more, and still have them, but I selected 200 prime cuts of fine flank SVXY and wrapped it up for sale.  $9,250.77 later, I went shopping in the aisles of the supermarket called "Options Chains" and rang up some expensive purchases.  At first I got into October but later traded out; those details aren't important to this story (no, wait!  Details are important as I made a small profit doing that).  The profit was negligible in the grand scheme of things, so let me get to the conclusion of this story.

Of course, the story is not over and will not be until as late as December.  Here's what has happened so far, though:



I replaced 200 shares' worth of SVXY (trading at $46.29 on the day I liquidated them) with 7 calls for SVXY $40 strike at the December 18th expiration, paying $12.30 for each option.  That's $8,610 worth of betting that SVXY will be at least $52.10 by expiration.  This assumes that if SVXY is trading at $52 on the day of expiration, $40 calls would be worth $12.00, or about what I paid.

In the meantime, though, SVXY is not approaching $52; it's still about $47 as of this writing (remember, it was about dollar lower when I "converted" shares to calls), and right now the calls are fetching about $13.00.  I could sell right now and get a few dollars in profit.

My hope, however, is that hanging onto the calls will allow me to benefit from the rise in share price more than I would have, had I simply held onto the 200 shares.  Example scenario:  Near expiration, SVXY may trade at something like (this is a hypothetical number) $62.  This is a full ten dollars over the price needed for me to break even on my calls.  In this example, the $40 calls would be trading for $22 each.  Remember, I only paid about $12 each for them.  Let's compare my benefit on the calls vs. simply holding the stock, with no calls bought:

Calls bought in September for $12.30 each, 7 of them:  Purchase price $8,610.  Sale price near expiration:  $15,400, which represents a gain of $6,790.

Shares held from September (at the price and date I executed this little plan) through the date the calls I would not have bought would expire:  200 times $46.29 = $9,250.77 and the fantasy price quoted above on expiration date of $62 times 200 = $12,400 which represents a gain of $3,149.23.  You can see that the calls would net about twice as much profit as just the shares would.

Note that I did not use all of the cash generated from the sale of shares to purchase calls; I still had some left over, but I did not include that in the comparison.

What I've basically done is attempted to use the gain I had previously hoped to get from my former lot of 200 shares of stock and increase the profit, above a certain price point in SVXY, to the gain I'd get from having 500 additional shares of stock (700 total)  instead of just 200, with some premium paid for the privilege, of course.  At a share price of about $54.70, I'd start to make more from the options versus just holding the shares and saving myself the stress and risk.  Of course I'm hoping for an all-out party in which the calculations break the calculator.  But before that happens, let's just hope I'm not holding a pile of public-restroom paper towels for which I paid enough money that I could have bought a serviceable used car instead.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Wrap-up of an unprofitable month

August, in my estimation, could have been worse for my account. I say that because, although the total was negative in terms of actual account performance (which is calculated by taking the value of stock holdings on a given day, like the last day of the month, and accounting for booked gains and losses), I am more concerned with booked gains and losses than I am in value of holdings. Why? Because I wouldn't be holding my holdings if I didn't expect them to bring my account value up eventually, for one thing. For another thing, the purpose of my account is to be able to withdraw cash from it on a regular basis, that cash being generated from my booked gains (more so than by booked losses - those aren't great for building up cash.  And my "account value" is not important to me, as long as I have something with which to make something, and keep my ATM running smoothly.)

While I did book more losses than gains during August, due only to ONE unfortunately run-over position (I take the blame, just like I take the credit when things go right - it cuts both ways - it's never "The Market" helping nor hurting me, although to be fair, it really is, in both cases), things could have been a lot worse. The horror story was detailed two posts back, so let's not go over it again. It's healthy to move on and live in the present.

I do want to add something to my record of booked gains and losses for the month of August, and that is the cash generated by the sold puts that resulted in shares being assigned to me. If the shares are going to be part of my family, you can bet that I'm not going to just throw away the money that came in as a stipend toward the care and maintenance of those new cars in the driveway. The brokerage seems to like to calculate cost basis by taking the premium received and setting it against the cost to purchase the put-to shares, but I like to keep things more honest: The stock cost a certain amount - let's just call the purchase price what it is - and I got a certain amount of cash in the account as compensation for my time and trouble; they are two different types of currency, in my mind.

Let's append with the following:




So, officially, my booked gains/losses for August were -$3,060 , but since I like to take the cash received into account, I consider the booked gains/losses more realistically to be -$1,156.11 . Either way, I am sitting on stock that cost way more than the current market value, putting my "account value" and "account performance" down in the dumps month-over-month. Even taking the current value of my put-upon stocks into the big picture and calculating YTD gain/loss as I do every month, I am up well over 50% YTD (fluctuating a few points day by day); how is "the market" doing YTD?

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Easy trading before the hurricane came through

This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/08/31/easy-trading-before-the-hurricane-came-through/

As someone pointed out two posts back, I did tell everyone: "Follow along for a less wordy (because I've already explained it all) installation documenting the conclusion to this story pretty soon, as the story must end before the dates stamped on my only two current positions: Friday the 21st."

So here it is, minus lots of words, because there's not a ton to say other than when I opened, when I closed, and the prices (and the way I dodged being assigned a lot of shares at the associated strikes.)


A picture is worth a thousand words, but here are few on top of that, anyway:  On August 11th, with SVXY in the low 90s, and on August 12th, with SVXY in the mid 80s, I wrote puts for the 85 strike and the 77.50 strike (respectively), both to expire on August 21st.

On August 19th, feeling that anything could happen between then and Friday (good one, huh?) I bought back all, thinking I was being overly conservative on the 77.50s, but doing it anyway, just to raise cash, and because eight cents seemed like a fair price to get out of harm's way.

The funny thing is that Friday ended with both of those strikes cut through like a red hot surgical scalpel through butter.  Even the 77.50s would have been assigned, had I sat there watching the market like a slacker watching TV.  This is not to say I didn't get into more trouble later (I'm expecting a Santa sack full of early Christmas presents this week), but this is the story of last week.


I ended the week $918 richer (see above.)  Simple trade; not very challenging to monitor under stable market conditions; almost boring enough to fall asleep to.  If only every trade could be so easy, right?

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

In which I get a black eye, but escape a worse black eye

This post may also be read at:  http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/08/25/trade-in-which-i-get-a-black-eye-but-escape-a-worse-black-eye/

It was a black eye I gave myself, of course.  If this blog were all sunshine and lollipops - well, that would be great.  I'll work on it.  For now, it's not happening.

So last week I got it into my head to sell some UVXY 55 calls, thinking that strike was unlikely to hit.  Under "normal" market conditions, that would be a reasonable belief.  As everyone and their kid's kindergarten teacher knows by now, the market has had a "correction."  I got sent to the house of corrections along with the market.

After seeing margin calls in my account so high they cannot be comprehended by the human brain, I sat through - crunching peanut-butter-smeared granola bars and chasing them with coffee - and watched the carnage subside.  Too proud to close a position for a loss just to avoid possible future damage, when I firmly (no, shakily) believed the damage would not become a reality, I sat there and tried to live on a steady diet of hope and lip-biting.  My belief was (still is, but it's moot now) that if the market bounced back fast enough, everyone would be amused by the idea of UVXY 55 and I'd be able to tell everyone the story of how I made 400 lousy dollars from the hardest trade in my life.

Instead, as my honest suspicions told me would happen, a second VIX spike happened today (August 25th) with UVXY following suit trying to get a senior discount at all the diners in town with its 65+ card.  $66.81 is the highest print I see today.

$16.90 is the highest price someone paid today to negotiate UVXY 55, expiring this Friday (the 28th) and it was done just before the close.  I don't have that kind of money to throw away, so thankfully I threw away just $5.95 earlier in the day (would have preferred the $2 range, but at least I didn't ruin my account.)  On 11 contracts, that's enough money to cause all-day grouchiness, especially since I still don't think UVXY will be at 55 on Friday, but to satisfy the brokerage which does not wish to ask their employees to mortgage their house to protect my account, I did it.  Because I am not working with play money, and must make good on the contracts I have written, I got out of a contract that I know deep down has the potential to cost me money my pockets are not deep enough to produce.  When your broker calls and says "we are watching this," it tends to nudge you to dispose of the miserable headache-causing mess.

Shouldn't I have hedged it?  Yeah - coulda, shoulda, woulda.


In addition to this I sold puts, both prior to the "corrective phase" and in the midst of it, for SVXY at prices people will laugh at me for during the foreseeable future.  So I will have a large pile of "stock" to work with, and how long my account total remains depressed due to it remains to be seen.  I'll sell the dickens out of calls, though, and make what money I can.

Prepare for some boring times on this blog (maybe.  You never know.  No one knows, or more people would be profiting like geniuses from current market conditions.  The genius count does not get added to by this writer.)

Monday, August 17, 2015

The bull market lives! Long live the bull market!

This post may also be read at: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/08/17/the-bull-market-lives-long-live-the-bull-market/

Or at least through the end of this week.  After that I'll be ready for anything else, but please - whatever is keeping volatility low - stay stable for a few more days.

My escapades this month started on August 3rd, when I thought I'd draw a line in the sand for UVXY.  See chart below. UVXY was in the $25 range that day and its fraternal twin VIX was in the low 12s. I calculated that UVXY was unlikely to sink as low as $24 during the next two weeks, and wrote puts at that strike for 93 cents.  Later in the day, those puts eroded in value to just 63 cents, and I could not pass up such a quick bargain, so I rang the register and put the proceeds right in the till.

Later in the afternoon, I looked for better premium on an even more attractive strike. After a jog around the park, UVXY took a solid nap, dropping back down to its morning levels, and I went searching for premium, this time deciding to be a little safer (since my estimates can be wrong).  I wanted to hold this one until expiration (that's usually my intent) and get more than just the icing off the cake, as I did earlier in the day.  So I chose a lower strike this time, $23.50, at the same expiration nearly two weeks away, and got a price very close to the one I had just paid to close the previous, more "dangerous" contracts.  I considered it basically a "free" move to a safer strike.  To make it seem like a deal even better than "nearly free," I wrote more contracts.  I wanted more money than I would have gotten had I just held the previous set of contracts, and I was willing to further my own willful delusion by taking on more risk (writing more contracts.)  At 63 cents each as payment, and taking on the risk of being assigned $28,000 worth of UVXY, I stood to make seven big bills for my time and trouble.


I could have held until expiration day to get every last penny out of the trade, but with two days to go, once again I could not pass up the bargain of closing the trade for just two cents when VIX did a one-day-only spike up into sixteen land.  UVXY startled itself up to $30 in sympathy, options traders got a case of the vapors, and someone left those contracts on the block for a price tag of just pennies, so I threw two pennies in that direction and left town twelve contracts lighter.  Subtracting commission, it turned out to be exactly the quoted figure: Seven sheets of double-digit currency.  So that was the end of my UVXY activity in August (so far - barring any new weird ideas I might get.)


Going back to the first week of August for an explanation of my motives:  While VIX languished around in the 12 range and no one had a foggy clue what SPX was going to do, I saw nothing to do but engage in the above hilarity plus accompanying chuckles called "selling SVXY calls."  Note that the below chart is, not coincidentally, pretty much a flipped version of the one above.  On August 4th I got it into my head to write 99 calls and someone else was handing out $2.20 to buy them.  I kept those under my hat all the way through today, when I decided that in the same way no one knows what SPX will do, there is no way in the dickens that SVXY can be counted on to do anything in particular for even the next five days, and I'd be willing to pay 20 cents per contract to get out of SVXY's way.  Pocketing a hefty "worrying fee," of course.  The worry coming from the way SVXY twice kissed $97 or thereabouts, right after I wrote those "take your chances" tickets.  Writing calls on SVXY always seems like more of a sweat-inducer than writing puts, if only because SVXY tends to march up the hill steadily with almost no encouragement under all but the most worrisome market conditions. 



Well, that's the wrap-up on my early-August attempt to get the leftover crumbs out of the pan where the great summer VIX cake was baked and served and all but forgotten about by now, with only some sagging volatility indexes left behind to make us wonder if it ever really happened.  Now, notice that so far these positions I opened and closed were designed to vindicate my thesis that volatility was not going to get much lower, or at least that the good-time party friends of VIX (my buddies UVXY and SVXY) could only go so much lower or so much higher (respectively).  That's a hard way to make money, though, when volatility is already low.  Around a week ago I shifted tactics, but didn't really shift sentiment.

Unless and until there's some sort of spike in volatility, I'll take the premium where I can find it, and I'll risk being forced to take on water if I have to.  Being paid a bonus to buy SVXY at prices not seen all summer other than during the July VIX bake-off is a worthwhile venture, in my estimation, and so is picking up bet money on the "do not cross" lines set at various points south of the current trading price.  On August 11th and 12th I wrote puts on $85, and then, balancing the likelihood of being assigned shares with the compensation I'd get for the inconvenience (of taking on nearly double the SVXY I'd be a proud owner of - I'd be a nervous owner if assigned all), I wrote a few more puts on $77.50.  Premium on the former was $1.65 per contract, and on the latter, a whopping (proportionally speaking) $1.45.  The reason the premium was so decent on the 77.50s is because anyone who comes along for the ride must chip in for gas.  No, really - as depicted by the blue arrows, I took advantage of an overnight share price drop to pick up the last few.  Follow along for a less wordy (because I've already explained it all) installation documenting the conclusion to this story pretty soon, as the story must end before the dates stamped on my only two current positions: Friday the 21st.

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Mid-month status, appended

Look at the graphic in the post below, and then examine this one:


You will see that the UVXY puts are gone.  I was able to buy them back for 2 cents each after the market washout that took place overnight.  Also, sometime during the day yesterday I wrote the SVXY 85 puts (which looked terrible this morning - something like $700 in the red - but recovered significantly throughout the day, as you can see), and this morning I wrote the SVXY $77.50 puts.

What will happen next?  Your guess is as good as mine.  I just wait and see whether I get to keep the money, or if the money will take me by the collar and march me to the window where I am forced to make a big, fat purchase. (Or even worse, get stuck with a "due immediately" bill.)

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Mid-month status

Not that it seems like mid-month yet, but the dates are now double-digit, and if I haven't moved along making something this blog can record in black ink, I'm woefully behind, that's all I can say. Gains can be made in the eleventh hour, but that's not how I plan for it. I don't think about dates or amounts - I simply think, "What's the most money I can get started making today, without getting run over?" On the fourth and the third of August I opened the following positions. Was the timing perfect, and were the prices precise? I doubt it. I tend to be a perfectionist by nature (in some areas - quite the opposite in others) and this venture is challenging my tendency to maximize and scrutinize, and then back-test and criticize myself for not getting the same result some imaginary person out there got with their theoretical genius trade. So it is what it is - a ham-fisted money grab that got slim around the edges yesterday, but appears ready to get a new lease on life today.

image taken pre-market today, August 11th

That's all I have.  That's all I'm working with.  Will that stay the same today?  Tomorrow? Will I cap either or both of those off as short strangles, as I planned to do Friday but didn't do? We'll see.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

July: Tricky by anyone's standards

This post may also be read here: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/08/02/july-tricky-by-anyones-standards/

As if the first half of July didn't provide enough adventure, I set out to bring in a few more dollars during the second half.  As usual, I survived some scrapes and scares and ended up with just that:  A few more dollars.

Set forth below is my ill-timed scheme to capitalize on what I believed would be persistent volatility aftershocks for the remainder of July.  I wrote calls on SVXY at the 94 strike for the July 31st expiration, and the very next day - well, you can see what happened.  Two days later, still hoping I'd hang in there long enough to get the glory, I reinforced the same strategical position (read: I made things potentially worse for myself) by writing UVXY puts at the 25 strike also for the July 31st expiration.


Now, take a look at the 14-day charts above to see where those securities ended up at month-end (the expiration date of my contracts.)  I would have been fine holding those through the end of the month, and would have made virtually all of the $946.50 I set out to make.  But in a fit of disgust on July 23rd, having already viewed a lot of red ink and pondered rolling schemes until my eyes were ready to fall out, I closed those positions, loathe though I am to book a loss - ever.  (And you will see by the end of this post that it was the only loss booked during the entire month.)  See below for the result:  Profit on one, loss on the other, for a net loss of a few hundred dollars.  As already mentioned, now I have the benefit of hindsight to see that I could have held onto them, but I consider my fundamental mistake - if I made one - to be writing those options too close to the stock price at the time and too far away (two weeks is a long time with anything trading that close to strike unless you want to characterize it as "level-calling," or reckless speculating, which I am not casting judgment upon. I probably do it a lot.)

 

After seething for just about exactly one day (and declaring publicly on twitter that I would get "trader's revenge"), I gathered my wits and focused in on SVXY, and opened a short strangle.  This time I set out to be prudently conservative. See the 7-day chart below, showing my exit point on July 23rd from the above mess and the points at which I opened new positions on July 24th.  I wrote puts on SVXY at the 81 strike for the July 31st expiration, and late in the day (that adventure detailed in the previous blog post) wrote calls on the same security, same expiration, at the 98 strike.


With only a week to go, premiums were low, but when you want to scrape a little return out of the market in just one week, you work with what inventory is still in stock.  With strikes that far from current price (SVXY was about $90 on that day, but with a big range of $89.03-94.36, which is difficult for even seasoned traders to get solid footing on when you think about it), there's probably something to be had at every strike within a crazy person's idea of reason.  I found those crazy offerings and put them right into my account.  (55 cents on the 81 puts and 35 cents on the 98 calls.)


Above, see the outcome.  On Monday, July 27th (the next trading day after opening the position), I could not resist the 5-cent buyback available on the 98 calls. What happened is that SVXY plunged so much during a weekend gap between Friday the 24th and Monday the 27th - down to 83.58, (which, by the way, made my short puts look temporarily ugly) - that no one envisioned SVXY up near 98 anytime soon, so premium dried up instantly.  I closed the calls out, if for no other reason than to free up margin to write different calls later in the week (although I never did.)  As for the 81 puts, they courteously and conveniently expired worthless.

So, at mid-July, I set out to make $947; failed by losing $229 instead; vowed that I'd make that back or better; made $640 on the succeeding strangle, for a net of $411 on my end-of-July money-grab.  Which is not what I'd normally consider exemplary, but added together with accomplishments earlier in the month, makes for a month I will not complain about!  (total trades for the month below)


Monday, July 27, 2015

Mini-blog for a mini-trade

This post may also be read here: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/07/27/hitting-a-single-in-svxy-by-meredith-kelley-zidek/

Sometimes it isn't the biggest trade that brings the most joy.  What I'm saying is that a half-baked idea so impulsively formulated that I didn't think to throw the trade through until seconds before market close on Friday...

(see illustration below:)


...turned into an instant money-maker that grew to all but 15% of its full potential value less than one trading day after the crazy wish-making order was incredibly filled.


So what do you think I did?  Instead of waiting four more days to find out if the tide would turn against me and if the tide might contain sharks and jellyfish, I just cashed it right in today.  Someone else took ten cents, and I thought I would probably not unload it for five, but in another wish-making fishing-line-throwing, I just cast my line to see if anything would bite.

Instant fill!  No more worries about SVXY holding a knife to me up at the 98 level.  I really, really, didn't want to be responsible for selling someone $78,400 worth of that security.  Wow, what a way to make $213!  There has got to be an easier way.  (Just kidding.  I'd do that any day, a dozen times over, for $213 while I sit here and exchange bon mots with other traders on twitter.)

In my excitement, I neglected to thoroughly explain this:  The opening order was timestamped received at 03:59:47 on Friday as pictured, and I assumed it got swept away with the deadwood, but to my amazement, at 04:04:49, the order was filled and this short-lived but fun-filled adventure got started. 
 
It's the timing and the price on entry and exit that made this a fun one, not to mention the way I no longer have to think about SVXY cornering me into some social obligation I'm not prepared to fulfill. I really didn't want to attend the 98-strike party and was looking for a way to gracefully decline just as soon as I accepted.




If $213 doesn't thrill you - well, every trade cannot be a ball hit out of the park.  Look back to some of my earlier posts in the month for more exciting fare - and I still have something in the works for this Friday. 

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Will that complete your order?

This post may also be read here: http://www.cboeoptionshub.com/2015/07/15/trade-analysis-selling-svxy-puts-by-meredith-kelley-zidek/

If you read the last post about the sea monster adventure otherwise known as writing UVXY 52 calls just before the Greek Drama unfolded, see the associated graphic and locate the portion of the sea monster that is closest to the sun.  That is to say, on July 8th and 9th, with my strike looming close and my account being distressed (including special notices in bold, red typeface sent to me), I must have had "making money" on my mind more so than "losing money," since I took some positions in the same direction, but from the other side of the table.  No, not just the other side of the table - more like pretending to leave, saying goodnight to everyone, then walking around the outside of the house and sneaking around the back where I could lay my trap undetected by anyone still playing cards at the table inside the house.

Due to some stroke of luck, or maybe having something to do with the many pictures of Alexis Tsipras propping his face up with his fingers, the UVXY calls deflated in value like a marshmallow just taken out of the microwave, and similarly, the SVXY puts written in the backyard of the allegorical poker-playing shack turned into something like a popsicle forgotten on the front seat of a car overnight during the hottest part of July.  There was a little to be salvaged from them yesterday, but since July 24th is a few days away, I decided to "take it off the table."  (Many card-playing analogies from someone who hasn't played anything more than "Go Fish" and not since about second grade.  I'm just not a card player.  I hear people talk, though.)


The post title is meant to allude to drive-thrus, and indeed, I did take the kids out for ice cream and slushies yesterday. And that's about all I did, in between stalking the next opportunity to scoop up some premium that someone else took it in their head to buy, that hopefully will send the red-print notices to them next time.



Nuts and bolts: I risked the possibility of being forced to buy $28,000 worth of stock. I got a margin call from my broker for $19,618.93 overnight Thursday, but that's because I still had the UVXY monstrosity open at the time.  The margin call disappeared with no action needed on my part.  I was behind in this position by $468 at one point (maybe more - I don't remember how high the bid/ask got). I set out to make a maximum of $1,313.20, but I closed early and realized $1,123.00.

Monday, July 13, 2015

Rang the register

The aforementioned non-slam-dunk has been closed, and it's sort of a relief, although I admit I'm a little burned up about not getting the last $150.  That is a personality trait within myself that I had better learn to control.  Time is money, and I can probably make more during the four days between now and Friday, or at least have other things on my mind, and not wake up dreaming of scanning the options chains.


Well, maybe I'll still dream the same thing, without the side-dream about rolling two weeks out.



Nuts and bolts:  I risked being either assigned $52,000 worth of short UVXY shares or having my account debited in order to deliver 1,000 shares at $52 each to the contract buyer at a cost to me of whatever the difference would be between the contracted $52 and the price at which I'd have to obtain the shares (example:  $62 UVXY would cost me $10 per share or $10,000 as a loss to my account).  I could have bought shares at a price under (or even over) 52 to make these calls covered, though, at any time before assignment.   At one point I was behind in this position by $3,350 (or more - I don't remember every bid/ask but I think I may have seen $7.00), and I did receive a margin call for $19,618.93 from my broker, but it was in conjunction with the position detailed in the July 15th post.  The margin call disappeared with no action needed on my part.  I set out to make a maximum of $3,135.20, but closed early and realized $2,970.00.

Friday, July 10, 2015

Time decay at work

Here we are, almost two weeks after I wrote the non-slam-dunk calls you see in the post below.  As you can see, last Wednesday and Thursday they were trading for around $2 or so per contract, and now they are doing exactly the same, with the underlying trading even a little higher today than it was on those days.  That's because the clock is ticking, the hour is getting late, and people are leaving the party.  Does anyone really think UVXY will perform that parlor trick (fetching $52 per share on the sale block), if it hasn't done so yet?  Traders talk with their money, and the money is saying "no."  (Bids are $1.97 on this nonsense, as I type.)

Last night I had to do some homework, though.  After the price action in UVXY yesterday (and a friendly "message" from my broker), I realized that to keep my broker happy (I tend to bite off a little more than I should - my eyes are bigger than my stomach), I should think about rolling.  Why roll?  "To avoid being assigned" is a classic answer, but I have another answer.  Two answers, really.  One is the obvious:  To buy time.  The other is to reduce the number of contracts, and thus the potential liability (which will make the broker scrutinize other people and leave me alone.)  I don't mind waiting a little longer to make money.  Sleeping well for seven or fourteen extra nights to realize a profit is a good tradeoff for sleeping poorly and facing some kind of adverse action, so if it's a difference of just a few weeks, depending on how much money we're talking about, I'll choose to wait.

(Oh yes, I also snuck in some short 70 July 24th puts on SVXY yesterday and the day before, and that had something to do with my name popping up on a list of people my broker felt compelled to communicate with yesterday.)

So anyway, I priced some farther-dated UVXY calls at various strikes, and looked at them again this morning, and was all ready to do it if necessary.  Not necessary, as of now.  But maybe I should wait until Janet Yellen speaks before publishing this. Yellen, what are you sellin'?  What happens after Janet speaks, there's just no tellin'.

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Bumpy ride

Instead of hearing about my trades after they are closed, how about examining and inspecting one while it is in progress?  Get your protective wear on.  Goggles and gown advised; it's a gross specimen.

July 17th UVXY 52 calls sold to open at $3.15 on Monday, June 29th

And that pic is from yesterday.  Were I inclined to update it, you'd see the mountain range rise again to approximately the worried-face level.

I'd enjoy documenting only the slam-dunk sha-zing/sha-zam results, but that leaves out the details on the "work" (er...  worry) in between.  What fun would that be, to see the finished plates coming out of the kitchen on an ornate tray, and not see the cook behind the swinging doors cursing and running around with a red face?  Some of those seamless-appearing trades farther down the blog look like they were born winners, but really it took some fancy footwork before they crossed the finish line in the black.  See if you can untangle them, based on dates, if you'd like to re-create the adventure (a prime example being a bunch of short SVXY calls in the 90 or so range that needed covering, and turned out to produce gains due to advantageously-timed purchase and sale of shares, despite share price breaching the strike and exceeding it by several dollars.)

By the way,  I never set out to do anything exciting.  My goal is to end with more money than I started with.  I like to set up a challenging puzzle for myself with a cash prize at the end.  If I have to pay to play the game, then I wrecked the puzzle.  If I make a few dollars, then I solved it. That's all I'm trying to do.  Sometimes my eyes get bleary and my brain gets weary from watching the scrolling green and red numbers and hearing the barrage of insights from every pundit on the internet who has a great idea on how things "should" be done.  I listen to just about all of it because I think I might learn something - and oftentimes I do - but ultimately, I have to focus on pretty much one thing at a time and remember that my goal is to get across the street without being hit. 

Thursday, July 2, 2015

As simple as it gets

So, in my last post I asked if anyone wanted to guess what I might do with the SVXY 99 calls expiring today.  That's all I had open at the time - no fancy combination of anything; just one lone set of naked calls (as simple as a trade gets) that would have to either be closed out or allowed to expire. The answer is that I disposed of them on Monday, not wanting to wait five days to earn the last $80 out of that deal, when better deals appeared to be on the horizon.  Here's a graphic of what I did, along with the other crazies who jumped on board to participate in this party.  As you can see, someone got a slightly higher price ($1.39) than I did, and once, just once, I would like the meet the individual(s) responsible so I could... give them a nice handshake and a compliment on their good work.

I held that for only four trading days, and that's not bad - I believe that $837 is best scooped up when you find it that quickly, so scoop it up I did. Some people obviously vacuumed up the last few crumbs, since SVXY hasn't given even a hint of interest in a level like 99 any day this week.


Never one to enjoy a dull moment, I made my moments jaw-clenching this week by writing some UVXY calls that expire on the 17th. Scoring those on Monday mid-afternoon was sweet, but even sweeter were the scores made by those who followed me on Tuesday and got my price by double. How do you think I felt on Tuesday? Worse than the way I feel now, that's all I'll say about it. Yesterday I was feeling pretty good, but today I don't believe I'm completely out of the woods. I like to be ultra-conservative (umm... yes, I know - Ha ha!) when writing contracts on these instruments. I like low stress. I prefer to just watch the money trickle into the account like water flows from a spigot into a bucket. Any sign that the pipe might burst is an unwelcome development. Follow along while this trade "matures" and find out whether the outcome is faucet-bucket-flow or call-the-emergency-night-plumber-for-help.

Monday, June 29, 2015

Another stock/option multi-legged trade that includes red ink

Here's another "adventure" trade.  As always, look at the dates.  For some reason I don't recall in precise detail at this moment, on May 22nd I bought 400 shares of SVXY at 91.30.  I think it had to do with some calls, and I wanted to protect myself by owning the underlying, and I decided to keep the shares and realize full profit on the short calls.  I do not pick and choose which trades to show unless it's because only some of them are pertinent to a conversation; all trades are posted each month in this space and also in the "all trades" tab.  So anyway, here we are going into the trade with 400 shares of SVXY  under my belt, so to speak.



So on June 1, with SVXY trading in the 89 range or thereabouts, some wild hare or other influenced me to write four puts at the 85 strike for the June 26th expiration.  I received $3.20 for each of these.  Translated, this means I expected to receive $1,280 for these at expiration, assuming the strike would not hit.

Then on June 9th, when SVXY was trading around 86 during the day, I decided to put a top on the cake by writing four calls for the same expiration, at the 91.50 strike.  Note that this is just a few cents higher than the price at which I bought the shares.  My expectation was that the shares could be called away for a tiny profit (any profit being better than any loss) and I would just keep the premium of $732.

On June 15th, I got bored with just waiting and waiting for this trade to unfold, so I "traded out of boredom" and wrote more calls (naked, because I didn't own any more shares to support these) but this time for the July 3rd expiration, and at the 93 strike.  SVXY was trading at around 88 this day.

So now I had a "strangle sandwich" (or you could say some naked puts and a set of covered calls) for the June 26th expiration and some naked calls for the July 3rd expiration.  On June 22nd, I got nervous as I saw SVXY creep up near the strike of my naked calls.  Being the responsible option writer that I sometimes am, I shelled out big $$$ to buy 400 freaking more SVXY at a cost of 92.90 per share (gulp), which is just below the strike on my naked calls of 93.00.

What do you think I did with this strangle? Any guesses?  Anyone followed along and read about how I closed some of this out?  Hint:  Look at my June 23rd post, a few inches down the page.  I feel bad that I just explained the same thing that I explained a week ago (on June 23rd, titled "Finished a $700 project 3 days early").  If anyone is enjoying reading this, then good for you - I am glad.  I think the only difference here is that I explained my strategy in more detail, and I included in the screen shot the short puts, which were a crucial part of the original strategy, which was a short strangle.  Can't have a strangle without both sides!  It's like having a sandwich with only one piece of bread.

The extra content in this post, as opposed to the one a week ago, is this explanation:  I bought the puts back on June 18th because I anticipated I would soon buy shares to make my naked calls into covered calls, and I didn't have the capital to do that without closing the naked puts.  Then I took my time watching the price of SVXY, hoping I would not have to buy shares, but that hope turned out to be in vain.

When you look at this all together, including the puts which were an integral part of the original strategy, you see that it came out to profit of $1,594, which is not bad for approximately 3 weeks' worth of shuffling, if you don't factor into that the date at which I bought the original 400 shares of SVXY, which, in all fairness, I bought during the legerdemain of some other past strategy.

Of course, if I had a crystal ball, or some as-yet-invented future-viewing goggles, I might not have bought that second lot of shares, and might have just realized the full $890 profit from the calls which were set to expire this week.  Instead I netted the buyback of the calls with the buying and selling of the stock for just a fraction of that.  But I do not have clairvoyant superpowers.  And SVXY ran up nearly to 98 three trading days ago.  What's a trader to do with their short calls, stand there with a "ROB ME"sign on the chest and back? And I decided I could "roll" those calls and maybe still get some good meat off the bone.  (Which remains to be seen.)

I really hope someone is enjoying reading this, and it isn't simply my own record, but if that's what it is, then it's better than a kick in the shins on a cold rainy day after missing the bus.

Look, though:  If you follow this blog, you'll know that just a few days ago I turned around and sold naked 99 calls (this is what I referred to regarding chomping some more meat off the bone).  What's going to happen with those?  I own no shares to go with them (hence, the designation "naked.")  What do you think will happen this week?  They expire on Friday.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Why I show a loss on some options (multi-legged trade explained)

Let's go back to May and take a look at something, and I will explain what I did.




This started as a simple short strangle; the reason you see two lots of three and one lot of one is because I made a mistake. I didn't realize a trade had partially filled, so I ended up with just one contract. I thought about dumping it right away but decided to just keep it and see if it worked out in my favor. As you can see, it did. But here is why there is a loss on one side of the trade, and why I bought stock, and why it was profitable overall.

Look at the dates. On April 30th, when SVXY was $78, on average, during the day, I wrote puts for the 77 strike for the May 22nd expiration.  I didn't think my order filled, so I cancelled it and moved on, but it turns out that one was filled, and you see it there. I didn't even see it until I had written the three puts (described below.)  The price for this was $3.30.  I kept it in my arsenal of hopeful money-bringer-inners.  Then I:

Wrote three puts at the 77.50 strike for $3.41 each

Wrote three calls at the 85 strike for $1.55 each

Then things got interesting, as SVXY went on a tear, leaving my sweating forehead behind in the dust.  I had a contingency plan, though, since the last thing I would want is to get assigned to make good on calls that were way in the money, if I have no shares to have "called away."  So when it looked like SVXY was not returning to seventies-town anytime soon, I bought 300 shares of it for $84.35, as you see above.  Obviously this was just cents under my call strike of 85.

That same day (May 15th), I cashed in the lone 77 put for a handy $268, as you see above.  I didn't do it because I wanted the money or because I thought 77 was a threat.  I think I needed to make room in my account to buy the shares, and/or I was tired of looking at the lopsided trade - I can't remember what my main motivation was.  But this simplified things.  Now I had a "strangle sandwich," as I call it, or a short strangle with some shares in between the short put strike of 77.50 and the short call strike of 85.


So then it was expiration week, and I think I wanted to do something else with my account and needed to make room, so on May 19th I bought back the 77.50 puts for a gain of $964.

With SVXY climbing every day, and expiration just one day away, I had a [virtually] known and guaranteed outcome for what was now just a set of covered calls.  I bought the shares specifically so they could be called away (at a small profit of $195), and I would keep the premium from the short calls.  The known profit would be proceeds from the liquidation of the shares plus $465 from the short calls at expiration, assuming they would expire worthless to the buyer, for a total of $660.

Then, although I didn't plan to do it this way, and would have done a few hundred dollars'-worth better, had I just stuck to my plan of allowing the shares to be called away, I got greedy and sold the shares one day before expiration for a gain of $1,694.  This left me really sweating it out, because I had gotten on the "greed train" at this point, hoping that I could buy back the calls the next day for less than the price at that moment.  I hoped for SVXY to pull back, in other words, and the time premium to evaporate.  Unfortunately, SVXY traded higher on May 22nd than on May 21st for most of the day, or at least for the parts important to me, because I bought the calls back for $5.83, resulting in a loss to me on the calls of $1,304.  (Instead of the approximate loss of several hundred less I was looking at when I hatched this last-minute daredevil plan.)  Netted together with the shares, the end result of the covered call adventure was a gain of $390, though.

The covered call move would have netted me $660, remember, had I simply let the calls expire and allow the stock to be called away from me.  Lesson learned on last-minute attempts to squeeze a little bit more out of an already-winning strategy.  But it was a winning move, overall, anyway, so I can't complain too much.

So, let's sum up the whole shebang now:
Short "mistake" put at 77 strike: $268 profit
Short 77.50 puts:  $964 profit
Covered calls:  $390 profit
Total for three weeks:  $1,622
(would have been $1,818 at expiration, excluding commission, had the underlying simply remained between the strikes.)
(would have been  $2,013, excluding commission, had I let the puts expire and had I not messed with the covered call near the end.)  I didn't let the puts expire because I needed the capital in order to protect myself by owning shares on the call side.  Maybe I would have been fine by leaving the puts alone and letting the calls do what they wanted, but I didn't know that, and I wasn't going to risk it.

Not bad for something that ran away from me immediately after I initiated it, and now you understand why sometimes you see big-ticket losses in my account.  Maybe they aren't actually losses at all, when you see them within the context of the overall trade of which those "losers" were just one important part.